GRADE equity guidelines 3: Health equity considerations in rating the certainty of synthesized evidence

• Main Authors: Welch V., Akl E., Pottie K., Ansari M., Briel M., Christensen R., Dans A., Dans L., Eslava-Schmalbach J., Guyatt G., Hultcrantz M., Jull J., Katikireddi S., Lang E., Matovinovic E., Meerpohl J., Morton R., Mosdol A., Murad M., Petkovic J., Schünemann H., Sharaf R., Shea B., Singh J., Solà I., Stanev R., Stein A., Thabaneii L., Tonia T., Tristan M., Vitols S., Watine J., Tugwell P.
• 格式: 雜誌
• 出版: 2017
• 在線閱讀: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85023780664&origin=inward; http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/41182

© 2017 The Authors. Objectives: The aim of this paper is to describe a conceptual framework for how to consider health equity in the Grading Recommendations Assessment and Development Evidence (GRADE) guideline development process. Study Design and Setting: Consensus-based guidance developed by the...