The argument from variation against using one’s own intuitions as evidence
In philosophical methodology, intuitions are used as evidence to support philosophical theories. In this paper, I evaluate the skeptical argument that variation in intuitions is good evidence that our intuitions are unreliable, and so we should be skeptical about our theories. I argue that the skept...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Goh, Esther |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Nanyang Business School |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142335 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Belief-justification of intuition-based beliefs
by: Chen, Yi
Published: (2021) -
The making of a Filipino philosopher
by: Gripaldo, Rolando M.
Published: (2008) -
A defence of Dworkin's arguments against Hartian legal positivism
by: Chow, Zhen Yi
Published: (2024) -
On the lives not worth starting: a defence of the veil argument against the non-identity problem
by: Ang, Wei Xiang
Published: (2023) -
Personal identity and what matters
by: Joaquin, Jeremiah Joven B.
Published: (2017)