Gacha: A case of gamebling

Gambling has consistently been understood academically and legally as an activity involving initial stake, uncertain outcome and potential reward. The categorical relation between games and gambling however continues to only become more convoluted; the paper focuses particularly where some of the fe...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Lagamayo, Patrick James Chua
格式: text
語言:English
出版: Animo Repository 2025
主題:
在線閱讀:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdb_philo/24
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: De La Salle University
語言: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etdb_philo-1039
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etdb_philo-10392025-05-22T08:21:02Z Gacha: A case of gamebling Lagamayo, Patrick James Chua Gambling has consistently been understood academically and legally as an activity involving initial stake, uncertain outcome and potential reward. The categorical relation between games and gambling however continues to only become more convoluted; the paper focuses particularly where some of the features and mechanics of the latter have been adopted and applied to the former—what can be termed as gamblification. One prevalent form of these gamblified games are known as “gacha games,” live-services structured on a freemium model that capitalizes revenue through player microtransactions on game currency which allow the acquisition of randomized virtual content through their respective loot box mechanisms. Literature on gacha games within the context of gambling mostly focus on either conceptual analysis or psychological quantitative studies that help better determine its ontological status, most of which point towards the opinion of it being a form of gambling. The paper hopes to contribute to the field of game and gambling studies by situating itself in the discussion of gacha games by taking upon itself a skeptical position, that we are unable to truly determine whether gacha games are forms of gambling or games without considering the greater implications of the gacha system to the game as a whole. To do so, the author first attempts at differentiating games and gambling. The ontology of games remains in contention unlike the latter that has seen more consistency in terms of definition. To aid with the differentiation, the paper refers to Katie Tekinbas and Eric Zimmerman’s definition which effectively renders it as the paper’s framework. After which, it is shown how gacha games are equally valid to be taken as games by primarily putting into question the role of the gacha system as a game element. Though it is true that the gacha system is not the (gacha) game itself, it is erroneous to take it as merely an element of the game that renders it a form of gambling when much of player decision and game state entirely hinges on interactions with it. The paper thus claims that gacha games are not just gamblified games but blurs to the distinction of games and gambling. 2025-05-15T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdb_philo/24 Philosophy Bachelor's Theses English Animo Repository Gambling Philosophy
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Gambling
Philosophy
spellingShingle Gambling
Philosophy
Lagamayo, Patrick James Chua
Gacha: A case of gamebling
description Gambling has consistently been understood academically and legally as an activity involving initial stake, uncertain outcome and potential reward. The categorical relation between games and gambling however continues to only become more convoluted; the paper focuses particularly where some of the features and mechanics of the latter have been adopted and applied to the former—what can be termed as gamblification. One prevalent form of these gamblified games are known as “gacha games,” live-services structured on a freemium model that capitalizes revenue through player microtransactions on game currency which allow the acquisition of randomized virtual content through their respective loot box mechanisms. Literature on gacha games within the context of gambling mostly focus on either conceptual analysis or psychological quantitative studies that help better determine its ontological status, most of which point towards the opinion of it being a form of gambling. The paper hopes to contribute to the field of game and gambling studies by situating itself in the discussion of gacha games by taking upon itself a skeptical position, that we are unable to truly determine whether gacha games are forms of gambling or games without considering the greater implications of the gacha system to the game as a whole. To do so, the author first attempts at differentiating games and gambling. The ontology of games remains in contention unlike the latter that has seen more consistency in terms of definition. To aid with the differentiation, the paper refers to Katie Tekinbas and Eric Zimmerman’s definition which effectively renders it as the paper’s framework. After which, it is shown how gacha games are equally valid to be taken as games by primarily putting into question the role of the gacha system as a game element. Though it is true that the gacha system is not the (gacha) game itself, it is erroneous to take it as merely an element of the game that renders it a form of gambling when much of player decision and game state entirely hinges on interactions with it. The paper thus claims that gacha games are not just gamblified games but blurs to the distinction of games and gambling.
format text
author Lagamayo, Patrick James Chua
author_facet Lagamayo, Patrick James Chua
author_sort Lagamayo, Patrick James Chua
title Gacha: A case of gamebling
title_short Gacha: A case of gamebling
title_full Gacha: A case of gamebling
title_fullStr Gacha: A case of gamebling
title_full_unstemmed Gacha: A case of gamebling
title_sort gacha: a case of gamebling
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2025
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdb_philo/24
_version_ 1833068401853988864