PERBANDINGAN AKURASI PERAMALAN METODEARIMA DAN GARCH UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI IHSGPERIODE 1991 - 2011
Investing in the stock market requires a lot of information that affects stock prices. Stock values having higher volatility reflect high level of risk as well. Technical analysis is a tool used to predict stock price movements and an influencing indicator based on historical data. If the historical...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
格式: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
出版: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
主題: | |
在線閱讀: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/98836/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=54928 |
標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
id |
id-ugm-repo.98836 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
id-ugm-repo.988362016-03-04T08:45:56Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/98836/ PERBANDINGAN AKURASI PERAMALAN METODEARIMA DAN GARCH UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI IHSGPERIODE 1991 - 2011 , Budi Nugroho , Prof. Dr. Sukmawati Sukamulja, M.M. ETD Investing in the stock market requires a lot of information that affects stock prices. Stock values having higher volatility reflect high level of risk as well. Technical analysis is a tool used to predict stock price movements and an influencing indicator based on historical data. If the historical data and stocks predictive value are already known then it can be taken into consideration while investing. This study focuses on forecasting the daily Composite Stock Price Index starting from January 3, 1991 until June 30, 2011 by ARIMA and GARCH methods which will further be tested their accuracy of predictions. The results of this study indicate that daily stock index data over the period 1991 to 2011 are classified as not stationary. Having made difference 1 and log transformation then the data became stationary. The correlogram test results obtained a significant partial autocorrelation of nine lags, namely lag1, lag 10, lag11, lag 13, lag 16, lag 17, lag 25, lag 33, and lag 36. The best suited model of ARIMA(1,1,0) was obtained. On the residual value of ARIMA(1,1,0) there�s an ARCH effect forecasting is then performed by GARCH method and obtained the best prediction model GARCH(2,2). ARIMA(1,1,0) has better accuracy as compared to GARCH(2,2) because the forecast error value of one period ahead and the MAE and MAPE values were smaller, which means that the forecast of ARIMA (1,1,0) almost reached the factual value. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , Budi Nugroho and , Prof. Dr. Sukmawati Sukamulja, M.M. (2012) PERBANDINGAN AKURASI PERAMALAN METODEARIMA DAN GARCH UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI IHSGPERIODE 1991 - 2011. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=54928 |
institution |
Universitas Gadjah Mada |
building |
UGM Library |
country |
Indonesia |
collection |
Repository Civitas UGM |
topic |
ETD |
spellingShingle |
ETD , Budi Nugroho , Prof. Dr. Sukmawati Sukamulja, M.M. PERBANDINGAN AKURASI PERAMALAN METODEARIMA DAN GARCH UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI IHSGPERIODE 1991 - 2011 |
description |
Investing in the stock market requires a lot of information that affects
stock prices. Stock values having higher volatility reflect high level of risk as
well. Technical analysis is a tool used to predict stock price movements and an
influencing indicator based on historical data. If the historical data and stocks
predictive value are already known then it can be taken into consideration while
investing. This study focuses on forecasting the daily Composite Stock Price
Index starting from January 3, 1991 until June 30, 2011 by ARIMA and GARCH
methods which will further be tested their accuracy of predictions.
The results of this study indicate that daily stock index data over the
period 1991 to 2011 are classified as not stationary. Having made difference 1 and
log transformation then the data became stationary. The correlogram test results
obtained a significant partial autocorrelation of nine lags, namely lag1, lag 10,
lag11, lag 13, lag 16, lag 17, lag 25, lag 33, and lag 36. The best suited model of
ARIMA(1,1,0) was obtained. On the residual value of ARIMA(1,1,0) there�s an
ARCH effect forecasting is then performed by GARCH method and obtained the
best prediction model GARCH(2,2). ARIMA(1,1,0) has better accuracy as
compared to GARCH(2,2) because the forecast error value of one period ahead
and the MAE and MAPE values were smaller, which means that the forecast of
ARIMA (1,1,0) almost reached the factual value. |
format |
Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
author |
, Budi Nugroho , Prof. Dr. Sukmawati Sukamulja, M.M. |
author_facet |
, Budi Nugroho , Prof. Dr. Sukmawati Sukamulja, M.M. |
author_sort |
, Budi Nugroho |
title |
PERBANDINGAN AKURASI PERAMALAN METODEARIMA DAN GARCH UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI IHSGPERIODE 1991 - 2011 |
title_short |
PERBANDINGAN AKURASI PERAMALAN METODEARIMA DAN GARCH UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI IHSGPERIODE 1991 - 2011 |
title_full |
PERBANDINGAN AKURASI PERAMALAN METODEARIMA DAN GARCH UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI IHSGPERIODE 1991 - 2011 |
title_fullStr |
PERBANDINGAN AKURASI PERAMALAN METODEARIMA DAN GARCH UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI IHSGPERIODE 1991 - 2011 |
title_full_unstemmed |
PERBANDINGAN AKURASI PERAMALAN METODEARIMA DAN GARCH UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI IHSGPERIODE 1991 - 2011 |
title_sort |
perbandingan akurasi peramalan metodearima dan garch untuk memprediksi ihsgperiode 1991 - 2011 |
publisher |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/98836/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=54928 |
_version_ |
1681230432205537280 |