Analisa Komparatif Kinerja Reksadana Pendapatan Tetap Dan Reksadana Terproteksi Berdasarkan Indeks Treynor, Sharpe, Dan Jensen Studi Empiris Tahun 2008-2010
In taking an investment decision, investors want a lucrative investment and a small level of risk and quick returns. Therefore, there should be an assessment of the performance of mutual funds, so that can know what a mutual funds that has the best investment prospects. This study aims to determine...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/98392/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=53511 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In taking an investment decision, investors want a lucrative investment and a
small level of risk and quick returns. Therefore, there should be an assessment of
the performance of mutual funds, so that can know what a mutual funds that has
the best investment prospects.
This study aims to determine the performance of fixed income mutual funds and
protection, using descriptive and inferential statistical research, and data analysis
performed by the formula Treynor, Sharpe, and Jensen Measure and use the test
paired sample t-test. Elections were conducted on five investment managers with
the best ratings, each investment manager established two product types of fixed
income mutual funds and protection during the period January 2008 - December
2010
From the calculation has been done based on Sharpe's index and Jensen
concluded that the fixed-income mutual funds have performance level better than
mutual funds protection, while the Treynor index inferred based on mutual
protection fund has a better performance level compared with fixed-income
mutual funds. Based on the test of paired samples t-test proved that there is no
significant performance differences between methods Treynor, Sharpe, and
Jensen. |
|---|