Analisis Daya Saing Dan Perubahan Struktural Karet Indonesia 2000-2010
Sometimes comodity policy handle by government not use economic tools, for example developing of one comodity should be concern of comparative advantage of that comodity compare to other country who produce the similar comodity too. One of Economic tools for comparing advantages is RSCA (Revealed Co...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| 出版: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2011
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/89811/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=51089 |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| 機構: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| 總結: | Sometimes comodity policy handle by government not use economic tools, for
example developing of one comodity should be concern of comparative advantage of that
comodity compare to other country who produce the similar comodity too. One of
Economic tools for comparing advantages is RSCA (Revealed Comparative Advantage
(RSCA).
Rubber as one of our superior comodity (viewed by source of income) from non oil
and gas sector, still managed by government partially, which is shown by appointment of
GAPKINDO as a body to act on behalf of Indonesia, except there are problem.
Development progress og rubber comodity in fact there is no structural which is
measured with IPS (Index Perubahan Structural). This fact express that rubber policy
need more intensiveness attention from government. The two economic tools are used in
this thesis research to proof that rubber comodity should be handled by government of
the Republic Of Indonesia to grab more high value, economic escalation and farmer
welfare as a specificly.
Find that comparative advantage of rubber specifically natural rubber is very high,
those are from 2000-2005 RSCA 0,93 increase to 0,94 in the year 2006, and 0,95 on
2007 , but 2008 decrease a little bit to 0,94 and stabil in 2009 on point 0,94 from
maximum 1,00. This measerement shown that natural rubber comodity ha comparative
advantage and categorized as one of three biggest RSCA beside pulp and textile that
Indonesia has.
From view of industrial tranformation, Indonesian rubber industri also not shown
transformation, form primer to secondary, moreover to tertier sector. Indonesian rubber
still stand on primer sector, and this is shown by IPS still dominated by natural rubber.
On year 2000 amonut export of natural rubber is 97% and processing is 3%. On the
contrary from 2004 to 2009 export of natural rubber increase to be 99% and processing
rubber only 1%. This data shown that there is no transformation indexs
With high RSCA and no transformation index, ruuber development policy wgich is
now hold by Minitry Of Trade and Ministry Of Agriculture, GAPKINDO on behalf of
Indonesia in tripartee cooperation with Malaysia and Thailand shoul be evaluated or
refresh.
Those condition above are weakness of rubber in one sides, but also opportunity in
other sides. This situation motivates the writer to observe indonesian rubber condition on
2000-2010, besides expaectation of the global rubber market in the future are grown in
accordance with economic escalation and increasing of awareness of environmental
sustainability
Malaysian and Thailand rubber production estimated should be decrease because
the government policy to concentrated on the downstream sector and also divert part of
the rubber area to palm oil area. Thailand and Malaysia also facing the limitation of
area, which is located in the north side of Indonesia with marginal condition, so it means
those area are less productivity than Indonesian area, also limitation avalability of
labour
Indonesia as a very potential country to develop the rubber comodity, because of
higher RSCA especially in natural rubber, availability of land and labour, compatibility
of climate and others should be make Indonesia grab this opportunity. |
|---|