Tinjauan hukum terhadap power purchase agreement (PPA) antara PT Paiton Energy Company dengan Perusahaan Umum Listrik Negara (PLN)
In order to fulfill the demand of electricity energy, the Indonesian goverment has negotiated with private consortium. As part of pre-contractual activities, the negotiation resulted in Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) between PT Paiton Energy Company (Paiton) as seller and State Own Electricity Co...
Saved in:
主要作者: | |
---|---|
格式: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
出版: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2009
|
主題: | |
在線閱讀: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/81257/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=42121 |
標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
機構: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
總結: | In order to fulfill the demand of electricity energy, the Indonesian goverment has
negotiated with private consortium. As part of pre-contractual activities, the
negotiation resulted in Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) between PT Paiton Energy
Company (Paiton) as seller and State Own Electricity Company (PLN) as buyer.
This contract has been signed on February 12, 1994 in Jakarta then implemented as
Projek Paiton I (Paiton Project I).
Therefore, this research focuses on the power purchase agreement signed by
PLN and Paiton in the context of legal studies using an analitical prescriptive
approach. According to this approach, this research is expected to produce new
argumentation, theory and concept as a prescription to overcome to the legal
problems. This research analyses documents, bills, regulations and other relevant
texts in the legal system of the Republic of Indonesia.
This research shows that PLN, which has authority to provide public
electricity , has been under pressure and almost powerless in dealing with Paiton.
During negotiation proccess, Paiton has conducted communication with the head of
government separately hence the government negotiator team's offers were always in
comply with Paiton's interest. Having familial relationship and direct access to the
head of authoritarian government personally, Paiton has the psychological superiority
in the negotiation proccess. This condition has made the agreement between PLN and
Paiton to be catogerized as undue influence (willsgebreken). |
---|