DAYALENTING SEKTOR PARIWISATA DESA WISATA PENTINGSARI AKIBAT MULTIBENCANA
Pentingsari Tourism Village is a tourist destination in Sleman . This tourism village suffered a catastrophic impact of Merapi Eruption in 2010 and Gale in 2012. The tourism loss assessment is done to see how far the impact of tourism caused by multidisaster events. After the calculation, we perf...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/134814/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=77975 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
Summary: | Pentingsari Tourism Village is a tourist destination in Sleman . This tourism
village suffered a catastrophic impact of Merapi Eruption in 2010 and Gale in 2012.
The tourism loss assessment is done to see how far the impact of tourism caused by
multidisaster events. After the calculation, we performed an analysis of the process of
resilience and identification of tourism resilience factor. It is useful to know how a
community with its tourism sector can recover from a disaster. In addition, it can also
give a look for other factors that play a role in tourism resilience.
Loss assessment is done with Damage and Loss Assessment Method or DaLA.
The method use the two approaches, damage and loss. Damage derived from the value
of the asset repair damaged tourism, while loss refers to the loss of revenue due to the
closing effect of the tourist village after the eruption. The recovery process approach is
using roles of resilience in determining community response to a hazard event�. In this
approach, the analysis is conducted from the disaster, the initial post- disaster
conditions, and the start of the resilience until the resilience process is completed.
Meanwhile, the resilience is assessed by looking at the condition of the first tourist
visits until tourist traffic back to normal, and post-disaster resilience infrastructure.
Meanwhile, to identificate the resilience factors we use a tool \" relationship between
capital domains and community disaster resilience \" through indicators of social
capital, economic, human resources, physical and natural.
Eruption caused a loss of Rp Rp.406.660.000,-. It is also accompanied by
damage to infrastructure, homestay and attractions. Gale in 2012, causing a loss of
Rp.52.850.000, and damage to some homestay. The resilience process after the
eruption began when the residents returned from refugee at the end of the year. At first
visit, tourism resilience has not been completed. Tourism resilience finish at the end of
2011 that is when the visit and activities are returning to normal. However, resilience
of infrastructure is completed at the end of 2013. And at the end of 2013, tourist arrivals
were higher than before the disaster occurred. Post-gale resilience is faster than the
resilience of eruption. That afternoon, after the gale struck, residents helped volunteers
to do the cleaning on the trees which collapsed. Factors that affect resilience is the
confidence of customers to come back, and strong network with multiple parties.
Personal assets belonging to people is also used for resilience. Promotion ability, public
disclosure, the involvement of the whole community to develop tourism, natural
resources owned, construction of infrastructure such as roads and bridges, some help
from the government, NGOs, universities, relations, and tourist are other factors that
encourage resilience in Pentingsari. |
---|