TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEWENANGAN MENTERI KEUANGAN DALAM MEMPAILITKAN BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA (BUMN)
This research is aimed at analyzing the provision of an authority for the Minister of Finance to file bankruptcy against the State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and analyzing the types of SOEs against which the Minister of Finance can file a bankruptcy petition. It belongs to a normative legal research d...
محفوظ في:
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , |
---|---|
التنسيق: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
منشور في: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
الموضوعات: | |
الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/133359/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=73984 |
الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
الملخص: | This research is aimed at analyzing the provision of an authority for the Minister of Finance to
file bankruptcy against the State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and analyzing the types of SOEs
against which the Minister of Finance can file a bankruptcy petition. It belongs to a normative
legal research done by examining library materials or secondary data consisting of primary law
materials, secondary law materials and tertiary law materials. Data were collected using a
method of documentation and a tool of documentary study. Subsequently, they were analyzed
qualitatively.
The results and discussion of research indicated that the Minister of Finance is the only party
that entitled to file a bankruptcy petition against the SOEs for the public benefit purposes
because the regulators found the Minister of Finance has abundant and profound information
about the SOEs. Therefore, when there is a bankruptcy petition, the minister can make a right
decision. In regard to the types of SOEs, it should be SOEs established in the form of public
enterprises and engaged for the public benefits whose capital is entirely owned by the state and is
not divided into shares. Article 1 (4) of the Law concerning SOEs clearly defines that a public
enterprise is SOE whose entire capital is owned by the state and not divided into shares for the
public benefit purposes and in the pursuit of profits.
It can be conclude that the Minister of Finance is authorized to file a bankruptcy of SOEs
engaged for the public benefits because it is the most party that understand the financial
condition of the SOEs and is able to estimate the consequences. The types of SOEs that can be
bankrupted by the Minister of Finance are SOEs established in the form of public enterprises. It
is suggested that it is necessary to revise the Law concerning the Suspension of Debt Payment
Obligation (UU PKPU) that the party entitled to file a bankruptcy against SOEs engaged for the
public benefits is the Minister of SOEs and it is also necessary to emphasize that the SOEs
engaged for the public benefits, whose capital is entirely owned by the state and is not divided
into shares, is in the form of public enterprises. |
---|