PEMETAAN KERENTANAN DAN PENYUSUNAN JALUR EVAKUASI BENCANA GEMPABUMI (Studi Kasus Di Dusun Sayangan, Desa Jagalan, Kecamatan Banguntapan, Kabupaten Bantul)
Disaster mitigation is an effort made to reduce disaster risks. Understanding of the threat of disasters, vulnerability, community capacity and institutional capacity, as well as the pattern of spatial characteristics of an area is important to ensure disaster management working effectively and holi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| 出版: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/131215/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=71667 |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| 總結: | Disaster mitigation is an effort made to reduce disaster risks.
Understanding of the threat of disasters, vulnerability, community capacity and
institutional capacity, as well as the pattern of spatial characteristics of an area is
important to ensure disaster management working effectively and holistically.
Sayangan Village with its condition of high building-density, high population
density of 11.941 population per km2 (Census, 2010), and the narrowness of local
road (<1.5 m) with old buildings and walls at the sides of the road, would be a
problem when there is an earthquake. Based on these problems, this study aims to
(1) mapping and analyze the physical, social, economic and environmental
vulnerability in Sayangan Village in response to the earthquake threats, (2)
analyze the effect of household capacity towards vulnerability, and (3) develop a
method for the development of earthquake evacuation route in Sayangan Village.
The assessment of vulnerability (physical, social, economic, and
environmental) and of community capacity was conducted through a census
among 14 neighborhoods (RT) with the number of 365 households in Sayangan
Village. Data was analyzed using descriptive-quantitative. The development of
evacuation route, both evacuation line towards temporary evacuation site and
evacuation line towads final evacuation site, was conducted by considering road
safety, road width, and road accessibility.
The study shows that 41% of households were in very high vulnerable
condition (level 3) and 51% of households were on the vulnerability level 2.
Unfortunately, the high level of community vulnerability was not anticipated by a
good community capacity. This was demonstrated by 43% (157) of households at
very low level capacity (level 3). Barrier of evacuation due to the road condition
(narrow streets <1.5 m, old and fragile buildings/walls around the street, as well
as the limited availability of open space) results in some households in RT 4 and
RT 3 having difficulty in evacuation. |
|---|