PENGGUNAAN DIAGRAM PARETO DAN CEDAC UNTUK MENGANALISA TINGKAT KECACATAN PADA PRODUKSI GULA KRISTAL DI PG. GONDANG BARU

• المؤلفون الرئيسيون: , NUR ROCHMAH, , Dr. Jumeri M. Wikarta, STP. MSi
• التنسيق: Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed
• منشور في: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014
• الموضوعات: ETD
• الوصول للمادة أونلاين: https://repository.ugm.ac.id/131083/; http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=71526
• المؤسسة: Universitas Gadjah Mada

Crystals sugar are an important source of sweetener in everyday life and have a high level of consumption. The high levels of sugar consumption in addition requires the availability of sufficient amounts of sugar, also with good quality sugar. This report aims to identify the causes of sugar disability in PG. Gondang Baru, knowing seven tools are the most appropriate tools for analyzing sugar disability and sugar make comparisons with similar market products. The method used in analyzing the data that is defective sugar are Pareto diagram and CEDAC. As for the comparison with the research object sugar market products were analyzed using QDA diagram and sensory testing. Pareto charts compiled by collecting data crystals sugar disability such gravel in the form of sugar and sugar dust in PG. Gondang Baru, while CEDAC analyzed qualitatively by interviewing several workers at PG. Gondang Baru. Processing data use QDA diagram a sensory test by distributing 33 questionnaires while differentiating sensory testing conducted by the triangle test to determine the difference in which panelists were selected in advance by using a threshold test. The results of data processing show that the damage occurs much sugar is sugar as much as 199 sacks of gravel ranging from August 4 to 11 Septermber 2013, with a percentage of 0.33%. While the dominant factor that causes damage to the sugar that is because operators or workers are less careful during the operation of the machine, and the machine or equipment production has been much damaged and needs to be fixed immediately. As for the comparison with market products on the level of sweetness of sugar, both samples have not seen a real difference to the significance of the response panelists 5% and 1%.