OFSET PERTAHANAN DALAM KERANGKA PASAL 1320 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA : ANALISA IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 43 UNDANG.UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG INDUSTRI PERTAHANAN
Based on indonesia�s defense industries Law No. 16 of 2012, the purpose of defense industries is to ensure armed forces necessities by strengthening domestic defense industries while developing self-defense capabilities. In fact, Indonesian armed forces is still heavily dependent on foreign suppli...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
格式: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
出版: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
主題: | |
在線閱讀: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/128850/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=69223 |
標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
總結: | Based on indonesiaâ��s defense industries Law No. 16 of 2012, the purpose of defense
industries is to ensure armed forces necessities by strengthening domestic defense industries
while developing self-defense capabilities. In fact, Indonesian armed forces is still heavily
dependent on foreign supplier. Therefore, the defense industries law intends to incrementally
shift Indonesian foreign-centric orientation requirement to a strategy that emphasize
developing domestic defense industries, by implementing offset policy. According Article 43
of Indonesia�s Defense Industry Law, the government should prioritize in using domestic
arms product rather than foreign product if domestic industries meet the defense requirement,
but if the local defense industries has not been able to meet the requirement, the government
are allowed to buy from foreign countries. This chapter also regulates on countertrade, local
content and/or offset (technology transfer) of at least 85 percent of total contract.
Unfortunately, this rigid obligation is burdened not only for foreign industries but also
Indonesia Government and defense industries itself. Moreover, this law raises several legal
loopholes, first, the law is failed to define what is defense offset, second, form of offset and
how it should be conducted related to article 1320 civil code concerning valid agreement
requirement.
This research aims to define defense offset and its mechanism to support developing
domestic defense industries capability. It uses empirical normative legal research and analyze
how the shape of Defense Offset according to Law No. 16 of 2012 and its formulation in the
context of the applicability of Article 1320 of the Civil Code. This study concluded that there
are 4 (four) form of offset that should be implemented such as Direct Defense Offset, Indirect
Offset Related to Defense, Indirect Offset of supported, and Indirect Offset of Non-Defense.
This form is associated with defense and security equipment procurement cycle. The form
and mechanism of offset as an object of offset agreement, while the subject agreement covers
Offset Receivers and Providers. |
---|