STRATEGI MURAKAMI HARUKI DALAM MERAIH POSISI DAN LEGITIMASI DI ARENA SASTRA JEPANG
Murakami Haruki not only a novelist, he is also known as a translator. His works are both fiction and nonfiction got apreciation and recognition like national and international prizes. By his sucsess, Murakami became one of writers who could prove that the profession of writer can make a financial a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| 出版: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/128643/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=69001 |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| 總結: | Murakami Haruki not only a novelist, he is also known as a translator. His
works are both fiction and nonfiction got apreciation and recognition like national and
international prizes. By his sucsess, Murakami became one of writers who could prove
that the profession of writer can make a financial advantage, popularity and prestige in
social space. Eventhough he got all of those, he still doesn�t got fully recognition from
Japanese literary world. Literary elits consider his works did not represent the aesthetics
of Japanese literary so that his works can not be categorized as high literature. These are
the backgrounds of this research
The purposes of this research are: first, in order to know the the condition of the
field of power and the field of literary in Japan where his works are made. Second, to
know the strategy of Murakami to fix his position in the field of literature. Third, to know
the representation of Murakami Haruki regard to the field of power and the scheme of
generative habitous which expressed in the novel of Noruwei no Mori. To solve the
problems, the writer used theory of Pierre Bourdieu about the field of cultural production
to analize the field of Japanese power and literary, the accumulation of capitals, and his
strategy to obtain position and legitimation.
The result of this research shows that the position of Murakami in social space
does not stand at otonomous pole nor heterenomous pole. He stands at intersection of
those poles. Those are Murakami does not obey the law that applied on the autonomous
pole which representated by elit literary. On the other side, Murakami does not stand on
the heteronomous pole because he does not follow the domination of media and
publishers fully. Murakami uses the symbolic strategy to maintain or to improve the
social acknowledgement as well as his strategy of reproduction to maintain or to increase
capitals for the future. And he also uses strategy of reconvertion for his movement in
social space because of his position among the dominant and the dominated position |
|---|