POLITIK KULTURAL KH. ABDURRAHMAN WAHID DALAM DEMOKRATISASI
Cultural politics can be used as an alternative to the institutionalization of democracy in the country that has a pluralistic nation such as Indonesia . Gait Abudurrahman KH Wahid (Gur Dur) can be recognized as part of a form of cultural politics, and one of the figures that reveal the process of d...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/128331/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=68671 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| Summary: | Cultural politics can be used as an alternative to the institutionalization of democracy
in the country that has a pluralistic nation such as Indonesia . Gait Abudurrahman KH Wahid
(Gur Dur) can be recognized as part of a form of cultural politics, and one of the figures that
reveal the process of democratization in an alternative route to take inspiration from the
concept of habitus and doxa theory offered Pierre Bourdieu. Cultural politics shows that
democratization as an expression of resistance an actor (agency) within the structure of power
through discursive and controversial actions in the space of democracy, the cultural sphere
(cultural fields) and the political sphere (political fields) into the arena game (site of the
struggles and strategies), which included a scramble and fight a variety of capital (cultural
capital, political capital) of the figure, the political elite in power structures in changing or
maintaining a doxa. Owned capital determines the style of the game, the success or failure in
the race and capital exchange. This can be seen in the reproduction of discourse conducted by
Gus Dur in changing doxa.
By showing how the gait Gus Dur in mobilizing resistance to doxa in the form of
actions that have a unique and controversial provocation that has the capacity inevitably
generate controversy, as a form of resistance against the doxa as well as changes in the door
to build a set of values and discourse in the fight and counter the status quo and democratic
praxis of domination proceduralistic. It is seen that democracy as a form of resistance and
change a doxa. From examination of Gus Dur's efforts to develop a set of values and
discourse systems are intended to medekonstruksi and reconstruct discourse secretly
structural traps that have become standard , it appears that this tilt Controversy discourse that
actually allows the actor will be able to uncover and dismantle problem - issue that has not
been realized. The key steps are rolling deskribe nodes around it is considered as a process of
democratization restraint excited but at the same time it reaches deeper than the conventional
methods which are linear. The process of deconstruction and reconstruction of the discourse
through controversial measures that key actors, making the transformation of democratic
values has been successfully done in |
|---|