EVALUASI PELAKSANAAN KEGIATAN KULIAH KERJA KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT (K3M) DI KECAMATAN KOKAP, KABUPATEN KULON PROGO
Background: K3M or Kuliah Kerja Kesehatan Masyarakat was a program held by Faculty of Medicine Gadjah Mada University. This program was the equivalent of Kuliah Kerja Nyata Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (KKN PPM) which is held by Gadjah Mada University. The evaluation of K3M activity is important...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/128197/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=68532 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: K3M or Kuliah Kerja Kesehatan Masyarakat was
a program held by Faculty of Medicine Gadjah Mada University.
This program was the equivalent of Kuliah Kerja Nyata
Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (KKN PPM) which is held by
Gadjah Mada University. The evaluation of K3M activity is
important so that we could find out the effectiveness of
the program or what were the positive and negative impact
of the activity on the students who carried out the activity
and the community where the activity was held. The results
of this evaluation could be used for an instrument by the
Faculty of Medicine GMU to consider whether we should
continue or recreate this program in the future.
Objective: This research was done in order to evaluate the
Kuliah Kerja Kesehatan Masyarakat (K3M) program in
Kecamatan Kokap, Kabupaten Kulon Progo.
Method: This research used qualitative method with the
output being descriptive explanation. The datas were
obtained from the community health problem solving report
of K3M program in Kecamatan Kokap, Kabupaten Kulon Progo.
Result: Three out of nine reports were missing some of the
content on the report. The problem solving activity which
were reported on five out of nine reports observed were not
done according to the results of risk factor identification.
After observing all of the reports, it was not impossible
if there were any violation of the research report ethics
by looking at some questionable datas on the reports. This
could be caused by the flawed reporting system or flawed
grading system. The students' role as a doctor were also
less noticeable by observing the reports. In addition,
suggestion or recommendation on the report were less
appropriate because they were aimed at the people where the
student wouldn't be able to follow up if there were/were
no changes in the community.
Conclusion: Recommendation for Faculty of Medicine GMU as
the organizer of the K3M program is needed so that they
support and facilitate the implementation of the problem
solving program with the intention to improve the
effectiveness. On the other hand, the reporting system
needs to be reconsidered because it didn't reflect the role
of the students as a primary health care doctor. |
---|