EVALUASI FUNGSI REGULASI DINAS KESEHATAN PROVINSI PADA SEKTOR KESEHATAN DI PROVINSI BENGKULU
Background: Government Act Number 38 issued in 2007 on the differentiation of government affairs between central government, local provincial and local district/municipal government stated the obligation of local district/municipal government to protect, serve, empower and ensure welfare of the comm...
محفوظ في:
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , |
---|---|
التنسيق: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
منشور في: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
الموضوعات: | |
الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/123906/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=64022 |
الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
المؤسسة: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
الملخص: | Background: Government Act Number 38 issued in 2007 on the differentiation
of government affairs between central government, local provincial and local
district/municipal government stated the obligation of local district/municipal
government to protect, serve, empower and ensure welfare of the community as
well as implement regulation in health sector. Based on data of Bengkulu
Provincial Health Office, some health facilities and staff do not register, take
accreditation and certification. This indicates that regulation function is not yet
well implemented. Thus it is necessary to evaluate function of provincial health
office in the implementation of regulation in health sector.
Objective: To evaluate regulation function of Bengkulu Provincial Health Office
as regulator in health sector, viewed from input, process, output and environment.
Method: The study was qualitative with case study design. Evaluation of function
of Bengkulu Provincial Health Office was made on regulation in health sector, i.e.
licensing, registration, accreditation and sertification of health facilities and staff
against standard in the implementation of regulation on licensing, registration and
certification.
Result: Performance in input for the implementation of regulation was still
relatively weak: there was no support of regulation or policy in the
implementation of regulation, there was no staff specifically responsible for the
implementation of regulation, no budget allocation for regulation function
implementation, no standard or method for the implementation of control and
supervision, and facilities for the operation of regulation were limited. This
caused poor performance of regulation implementation so that the output was
poor, some health facilities and staff were no registered, there was no
accreditation and certification. There was no role of the environment, i.e. office of
integrated registration service that regulated licensing.
Conclusion: Regulation function of Bengkulu Provincial Health Office in health
sector was not well implemented due to lack of support from the government as
viewed from input, process, output and environment in the implementation of
regulation function in licensing, registration, accreditation and certification. |
---|