Analisis Kinerja Strategi Investasi Lump-Sum dan Dollar Cost Averaging pada Saham Indeks LQ-45 di Bursa Saham Indonesia Periode 2008-2009
This study aims to analyze portfolio performance which applying lump-sum and dollar cost averaging investment strategies on the stocks in LQ-45 index for period 2008-2009. Implementation of the strategies in different market conditions, bearish (2008), bullish (2009) or both is expected to give inve...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
格式: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
出版: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
主題: | |
在線閱讀: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/119136/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=59128 |
標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
機構: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
總結: | This study aims to analyze portfolio performance which applying lump-sum
and dollar cost averaging investment strategies on the stocks in LQ-45 index for
period 2008-2009. Implementation of the strategies in different market conditions,
bearish (2008), bullish (2009) or both is expected to give investors view for a proper
strategy to be applied in those market conditions.
The study was conducted by simulating a lump-sum investment strategy (LS)
and dollar cost averaging (DCA) in LQ-45 index�s stock that have been selected.
Using purposive sampling method, 12 stock in LQ-45 index with meet the criterias
were selected as a samples. The simulation was conducted for the period of 2008,
2009 and 2008-2009 then HPR, mean return, and standar deviation calculated for each
simulation period. Portfolio performance calculated using index Sharpe, Treynor and
Jensen.
The DCA was appropriate to be applied in 2008 as shown in the result that
generated loss -33.61% less than LS strategy which generated loss -49.79% and less
risky (in terms of standard deviation) of 13.64% compared to 14.22% resulted by LS
strategy. The LS was appropriate to be applied in 2009 as shown in the result that
generated return by 107.83% higher than the DCA strategy which generated return
only 51.84% and give lower risk (in terms of standard deviation) by 8.64% compared
to 9.00% resulted by DCA strategy. In 2008-2009, DCA strategies was appropriate to
be applied as shown in the result that generated return by 47.38% higher than return
generated by LS strategy which is 8.60% and resulting lower risk (in terms of
standard deviation) by 12.71% compared to 13.04% resulted by LS strategy. Based on
the Sharpe, Treynor and Jensen�s indexes, both portfolios in 2008 produced different
rankings, however the DCA strategy portfolio has relatively lower risk than portfolio
with LS strategy (in terms of standard deviation) and generate higher average of
return. In 2009 based on the Sharpe, Treynor and Jensen�s index, both portfolio
produced different rankings, however LS strategy portfolio has relatively lower risk
than portfolio with DCA strategy (in terms of standard deviation) and generated
higher average of return. Based on the Sharpe, Treynor and Jensen�s index, in the
period 2008-2009 both portfolios produced different rankings, however the DCA
strategy portfolio has relatively lower risk than portfolio with the LS strategy (in
terms of standard deviation) and generated higher average of return. |
---|