ANALISIS PELAKSANAAN MANAJEMEN ASET TETAP (TANAH DAN BANGUNAN) DAN STRATEGI PENINGKATAN PELAKSANAAN MANAJEMEN ASET PEMERINTAH DAERAH KABUPATEN NIAS
This research aimed to analyze the implementation of asset management in Local Government of Kabupaten Nias and how the strategy should be done to enhance the implementation of asset management. The implementation of asset management measured through the importance and performance using the IPA (Imp...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
格式: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
出版: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
主題: | |
在線閱讀: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/100742/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=57060 |
標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
總結: | This research aimed to analyze the implementation of asset management in
Local Government of Kabupaten Nias and how the strategy should be done to
enhance the implementation of asset management. The implementation of asset
management measured through the importance and performance using the IPA
(Importance Performance Analysis) is to measure the level of importance and
performance. (Martilla and James, 1977). However, the implementation asset
management enhancement was done by using the SWOT analysis. This research
was also use the Kruskall Wallis to find the difference of perceptions of the
importance level and performance among managements. This research was using
the purposive sampling technique with 78 samples of respondents.
The result shows that the inventory consist of data collecting, data
recording, and the information storing related to land and buildings assets that
have the highest importance level with mean 4,59 and modus 5 (very important).
Furthermore, the result of the highest of performance level was the legal strategic
plan of land and building assets procurements that integrated with the local
government goals and have the mean value 4,08 and modus 4 (good).
The Kruskal Wallis test shows that there was not any perception difference
on the importance level among the managements |
---|