COMPARISON OF CASING MATERIAL SELECTION IN GAS DEEPWATER WELL, CARBON CAPTURE STORAGE WELL, AND GEOTHERMAL WELL

Currently, deepwater resource has been explored since the increasing fossil energy necessity. On the other hand, carbon capture storage (CCS) has been developed in recent years in order to combat global warming effect, whereas geothermal development projects are growing rapidly also as green energy...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Triveda Fajri, Nugroho
格式: Final Project
語言:Indonesia
主題:
在線閱讀:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/64264
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Institut Teknologi Bandung
語言: Indonesia
id id-itb.:64264
spelling id-itb.:642642022-04-22T15:13:51ZCOMPARISON OF CASING MATERIAL SELECTION IN GAS DEEPWATER WELL, CARBON CAPTURE STORAGE WELL, AND GEOTHERMAL WELL Triveda Fajri, Nugroho Pertambangan dan operasi berkaitan Indonesia Final Project material selection, gas deepwater well, carbon capture storage well, geothermal well INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/64264 Currently, deepwater resource has been explored since the increasing fossil energy necessity. On the other hand, carbon capture storage (CCS) has been developed in recent years in order to combat global warming effect, whereas geothermal development projects are growing rapidly also as green energy necessity. Although CCS and geothermal drilling are similar to oil and gas drilling, the facts show that there are distinctions that cannot be marginalized in CCS and geothermal well design. Most of CCS and geothermal casing design is adopted from oil and gas design, therefore casing failure is often found when there are no modification made. The casing failure may be caused by failure in design or operation of running in the casing into the hole, or by another factors related to geologic condition of reservoir (i.e. extreme temperature and sour environment of reservoir, etc.)11. In gas deepwater wells, casing failure not only occurred due to high pressure and high temperature but also corrosion problems like in conventional oil and gas well. The main challenges associated with drilling geothermal wells are related mostly to hardness of igneous and metamorphic rocks, which are not commonly found in oil/gas reservoir, high temperature of the formation (average temperature gradient for oil/gas is 50F/100 ft and 12-130F/100 ft or could be more for geothermal formation) and typically under-pressured strata reservoir11, while one of the important wellbore integrity issues in CCS wells is casing failure due to erosion and corrosion by high pressured production fluids10. In casing design, casing material must be selected properly in order to mitigate corrosion as long as project development time. This paper presents comparison of casing material selection in gas deepwater, carbon capture storage, and geothermal well coupled to the case study based on corrosion rate prediction based on wellbore condition (i.e. pressure, temperature, etc.), fluid properties, and geologic environment. Reservoir fluid analysis and production performance analysis also considered in predicting corrosion rate. This study proved that few variables such as CO2, H2S, bicarbonate and chromium content, inclination, temperature, pressure, and pH are key parameters in determining corrosion rate. Temperature and pH significantly affect the corrosion rate in gas deepwater well N, carbon capture storage well F, and geothermal well T beside the composition of CO2 and H2S. Consideration must be made in selecting material for due to high content of CO2 and H2S, especially for CCS well. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
topic Pertambangan dan operasi berkaitan
spellingShingle Pertambangan dan operasi berkaitan
Triveda Fajri, Nugroho
COMPARISON OF CASING MATERIAL SELECTION IN GAS DEEPWATER WELL, CARBON CAPTURE STORAGE WELL, AND GEOTHERMAL WELL
description Currently, deepwater resource has been explored since the increasing fossil energy necessity. On the other hand, carbon capture storage (CCS) has been developed in recent years in order to combat global warming effect, whereas geothermal development projects are growing rapidly also as green energy necessity. Although CCS and geothermal drilling are similar to oil and gas drilling, the facts show that there are distinctions that cannot be marginalized in CCS and geothermal well design. Most of CCS and geothermal casing design is adopted from oil and gas design, therefore casing failure is often found when there are no modification made. The casing failure may be caused by failure in design or operation of running in the casing into the hole, or by another factors related to geologic condition of reservoir (i.e. extreme temperature and sour environment of reservoir, etc.)11. In gas deepwater wells, casing failure not only occurred due to high pressure and high temperature but also corrosion problems like in conventional oil and gas well. The main challenges associated with drilling geothermal wells are related mostly to hardness of igneous and metamorphic rocks, which are not commonly found in oil/gas reservoir, high temperature of the formation (average temperature gradient for oil/gas is 50F/100 ft and 12-130F/100 ft or could be more for geothermal formation) and typically under-pressured strata reservoir11, while one of the important wellbore integrity issues in CCS wells is casing failure due to erosion and corrosion by high pressured production fluids10. In casing design, casing material must be selected properly in order to mitigate corrosion as long as project development time. This paper presents comparison of casing material selection in gas deepwater, carbon capture storage, and geothermal well coupled to the case study based on corrosion rate prediction based on wellbore condition (i.e. pressure, temperature, etc.), fluid properties, and geologic environment. Reservoir fluid analysis and production performance analysis also considered in predicting corrosion rate. This study proved that few variables such as CO2, H2S, bicarbonate and chromium content, inclination, temperature, pressure, and pH are key parameters in determining corrosion rate. Temperature and pH significantly affect the corrosion rate in gas deepwater well N, carbon capture storage well F, and geothermal well T beside the composition of CO2 and H2S. Consideration must be made in selecting material for due to high content of CO2 and H2S, especially for CCS well.
format Final Project
author Triveda Fajri, Nugroho
author_facet Triveda Fajri, Nugroho
author_sort Triveda Fajri, Nugroho
title COMPARISON OF CASING MATERIAL SELECTION IN GAS DEEPWATER WELL, CARBON CAPTURE STORAGE WELL, AND GEOTHERMAL WELL
title_short COMPARISON OF CASING MATERIAL SELECTION IN GAS DEEPWATER WELL, CARBON CAPTURE STORAGE WELL, AND GEOTHERMAL WELL
title_full COMPARISON OF CASING MATERIAL SELECTION IN GAS DEEPWATER WELL, CARBON CAPTURE STORAGE WELL, AND GEOTHERMAL WELL
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF CASING MATERIAL SELECTION IN GAS DEEPWATER WELL, CARBON CAPTURE STORAGE WELL, AND GEOTHERMAL WELL
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF CASING MATERIAL SELECTION IN GAS DEEPWATER WELL, CARBON CAPTURE STORAGE WELL, AND GEOTHERMAL WELL
title_sort comparison of casing material selection in gas deepwater well, carbon capture storage well, and geothermal well
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/64264
_version_ 1823647489441398784