นโยบายต่างประเทศสหรัฐอเมริกาเรื่องการแทรกแซงด้วยกำลังทหารหลังเหตุการณ์ 9/11 : อิทธิพลของกลุ่มอนุรักษ์นิยมใหม่ในการกำหนดนโยบาย
To study the roles of neoconservatives in shaping and influencing U.S. military interventionist policies after 9/11 terrorist attack. After the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001, Bush administration declared the war on terror whose primary targets were the terrorists responsible for the attac...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| مؤلفون آخرون: | |
| التنسيق: | Theses and Dissertations |
| اللغة: | Thai |
| منشور في: |
จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย
2006
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://digiverse.chula.ac.th/Info/item/dc:33202 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| المؤسسة: | Chulalongkorn University |
| اللغة: | Thai |
| الملخص: | To study the roles of neoconservatives in shaping and influencing U.S. military interventionist policies after 9/11 terrorist attack. After the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001, Bush administration declared the war on terror whose primary targets were the terrorists responsible for the attack on World Trade Center and the Pentagon together with the states harboring them. As soon as the war on terror phase I with Afghanistan, Taliban regime, was over, regardless the fact the U.S. government was still unable to arrest al-Qaeda leader, Osama bin Laden, the Bush administration furthered the war on terror to phase II focusing on rogue states longing to possess the weapons of mass destruction and (according to the administration) intending to use those weapons on its people and neighbor countries. The most obvious link between the phase I and phase II war on terror was the Bush administration was concerned the possibility that those rogue states would transfer the technology of WMD or its weapons to the terrorists and they would, of course, use it against the United States. It led to the war in Iraq, after trying to disarm Iraq through United Nations and it did not effectively work since the Iraqi government rarely conformed to the UN inspectors. The Bush administration decided to intervene in Iraq preemptively and unilaterally which was perceived to be the most aggressive U.S. interventionist policy since the end of cold war. The study shows that apart from the external stimuli caused by the shocking terrorist attack on 9/11 which is believed to be the most reasonable rationale for U.S. military interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq, it is the neoconservatives who play the most active and vital roles in shaping and influencing those decisions. The neoconservative network from ones working in the administration and ones working outside the government is the reason explained how and why the neoconservative beliefs and roadmaps affected and guided the U.S. foreign policy of the Bush administration after 9/11. |
|---|