Dealing with Unreliable Evidence
Muhammad bin Kadar v Public Prosecutor was the culmination of a case described by the Court of Appeal as “extraordinary” and “one of the longest in the Singapore judiciary’s annals”. Two brothers, Muhammad and Ismil, were alleged to have robbed and murdered an old woman in her own flat and in the pr...
محفوظ في:
المؤلف الرئيسي: | CHEN, Siyuan |
---|---|
التنسيق: | text |
اللغة: | English |
منشور في: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2011
|
الموضوعات: | |
الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research_smu/20 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=sol_research_smu |
الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
المؤسسة: | Singapore Management University |
اللغة: | English |
مواد مشابهة
-
Admitting Previously Undiscovered Evidence in Subsequent Proceedings as Permissible Hearsay Evidence
بواسطة: CHEN, Siyuan
منشور في: (2013) -
The Judicial Discretion to Exclude Relevant Evidence: Perspectives from an Indian Evidence Act Jurisdiction
بواسطة: CHEN, Siyuan
منشور في: (2012) -
The Law of Evidence in Singapore
بواسطة: CHEN, Siyuan, وآخرون
منشور في: (2016) -
The Law of Evidence in Singapore
بواسطة: CHEN, Siyuan, وآخرون
منشور في: (2018) -
A Rare Interpretation of s 33 of the Evidence Act
بواسطة: CHEN, Siyuan, وآخرون
منشور في: (2013)